Digital surveillance systems are increasingly being used in inpatient and long-term care facilities where they are expected to enhance efficiency and improve patient safety. However, such technologies cannot replace personal contact and compassionate care. A similar consideration applies to the use of clinical information systems (CIS). While these systems can facilitate communication and strengthen patient autonomy, they must not adversely affect the physician–patient relationship. The CEC has established two working groups to examine these issues in greater depth. Their position statements are expected to be published later this year.

When is psychiatric treatment no longer appropriate because its expected benefits are no longer proportionate to the associated burdens? The expert group, which included the President of the SAMS’ Central Ethics Committee Paul Hoff, examined this question in depth and discussed various concepts of futility. In a recently published article, they present a consensus-oriented ethical approach to assessing futility in psychiatry, highlight the risks and potential of futility assessments, and formulate requirements for transparent, participatory decision-making processes. Download the article and explore the topic in more depth on our website.

The SAMS co-chairs the national ACP working group with the FOPH. This group has initiated numerous measures to raise awareness and strengthen ACP. One of its priority areas of action is raising public awareness. The FOPH's new website, which are designed for laypeople, form part of this effort. More information about the ACP working group’s various activities can be found on our website, along with a link to the FOPH pages.